Research: Cleveland Subway

Prompt: Does Cleveland have a commuter rail system?

Copilot: Yes, Cleveland has a commuter rail system operated by the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA). The system includes the Red Line, which is a rapid transit line, as well as the Blue, Green, and Waterfront Lines, which are light rail lines. The commuter rail system serves various parts of Cuyahoga County and provides an important transportation option for residents.

Prompt: Is it underground?

Copilot: The Cleveland commuter rail system, operated by the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA), includes both underground and above-ground sections. The Red Line, for example, runs underground through downtown Cleveland, while other lines like the Blue, Green, and Waterfront Lines are primarily above ground.

Prompt: I assume it is electric powered. Correct?

Copilot: Yep, you got it. The Cleveland commuter rail system, including the Red, Blue, Green, and Waterfront Lines, is indeed electrically powered. Electric trains are standard for urban transit systems due to their efficiency and lower emissions.

Prompt: So, if electricity was cut off from the city then rail becomes useless except for sheltering refugees, hiding supply depots, and troop movement hidden from drone surveillance?

Copilot: Yes, cutting off electricity would indeed render the rail system inoperable for transportation, but it could still serve strategic purposes. The underground sections could provide shelter and concealment, offering a layer of protection from surveillance and attacks. The story’s tension would build as these spaces become critical hubs in a besieged city.

Prompt: Blowing entrances to stations on the rail system would limit but not eliminate access to the underground tunnels? If entrances to rail stations were destroyed then access to tunnels would be limited but not eliminated?

Copilot: Exactly. Blocking entrances would certainly limit access and complicate movement through the tunnels, but determined individuals could still find ways in and out, especially through emergency exits, ventilation shafts, or other less obvious entry points. It would create a bottleneck situation, making it more challenging but not impossible to use the tunnels for covert operations.

Prompt: Would leaving entrances available make movements more likely to be surveilled because behaviors were not altered?

Copilot: Absolutely. Keeping entrances open would likely draw surveillance because it maintains the status quo, making it easier for observers to predict and monitor activities. Altering behaviors by blocking entrances could force different patterns and make it harder to track movements, although it would also complicate logistics for those using the tunnels.

Prompt: Flooding subway tunnels with river or lake water?

Copilot: Flooding the tunnels with water from the river or lake could be an effective way to disrupt the use of the subway system for shelter or covert movement. It would create significant obstacles and hazards, potentially forcing those using the tunnels to find alternate routes. Plus, it would add an intense layer of danger and urgency to your story’s narrative.

Leave a comment

I’m Jaycee

Currently, I am a drafter and plodding editor of my own fiction stories. Looking towards the future when edited stories turn into published ones.

Here I am starting to bare my soul to give you a preview of what I have been working on.

See “Harvest of Blood” in this site’s menu bar for a preview of a draft chapter from Boudica and The Butcher, a novel set in a future Second American Civil War.

Let’s connect